Wednesday, August 21, 2019
Follow us on
BREAKING NEWS
Identify weak links, Shah tells Hry, Maha, Delhi BJP leadersSYL: Centre to hold meet with Haryana, Punjab reps today सीएम की जन आशीर्वाद यात्रा: दिखी टिकटार्थियों में होड़, शक्ति प्रदर्शन के चक्कर में पूर्व विधायक लीलाराम गुर्जर और नरेंद्र गुर्जर के कार्यकर्ताओं में चले लात-घूंसे टिकटार्थियों की भीड़ देख सीएम बोले- एक अनार सौ बीमार, पर एक को ही देंगे टिकट, बाकी मिलकर खिलाओ कमल सीएम की जन आशीर्वाद यात्रा में विधानसभा चुनाव के लिए कैथल में टिकटार्थियों ने किया शक्ति प्रदर्शनहरियाणा की 4 जेलों में शिफ्ट होंगे जम्मू-कश्मीर के बंदी  : जम्मू कश्मीर में अनुच्छेद 370 हटने के बाद बंदियों को शिफ्ट करने की तैयारी क्लोज होगी चंडीगढ़ में दर्ज एफआईआर, अग्रिम जमानत की कोशिश कर रहे अफसर पोस्ट मैट्रिक स्कॉलरशिप घोटाला : रोहतक जिला अदालत में दायर की है याचिका नेशनल हाईवे पर राजनाथ और खट्‌टर की जन आशीर्वाद रैली के बाद अंधेरा कंप्लेंट पर भी हाईवे की हालत में नहीं हो रहा सुधार, अंधेरे में लोग कर रहे सफरPANCHKULA- शहर में अाज से पांच रुपए में अाधा घंटे चला सकेंगे किराये पर लेकर साइकिल
 
Editorial

TOI EDIT-Selective Outrage Recognise the threats to free speech. Rise above politics to defend it

May 16, 2019 06:49 AM

COURTESY TOI EDIT MAY 16

Selective Outrage
Recognise the threats to free speech. Rise above politics to defend it
Senior BJP leader Arun Jaitley’s stirring defence of free speech in the aftermath of Priyanka Sharma’s arrest was an important intervention from a top functionary in the government and ruling party. Jaitley rightly called out “left liberals” on the youth leader’s arrest, asking whether they have gone into hiding. He also tweeted that “humour, wit, sarcasm survive in a free society”. The safeguarding of free speech demands unity irrespective of ideological colours and the fight against the Emergency, in which Jaitley himself was incarcerated, serves as a glorious precedent.

A similar bipartisanship is again expected from contemporary politicians and the likes of Jaitley can remedy the polarisation in society by calling out the selective outraging by both left liberals and the Hindutva firmament. For instance, Tamil actor Kamal Haasan is facing threats and cases from the Hindutva brigade for his dubbing of Nathuram Godse as Independent India’s first terrorist. While associating religion with terror has become trite and tedious, there can be no questioning Haasan’s right to hold and express such an opinion. After all, Hindutva ideologues also constantly associate religion with terror.


Nevertheless AIADMK minister KT Rajendra Balaji, whose party is in alliance with BJP, has threatened to cut off Haasan’s tongue and cases were filed in Delhi and Tamil Nadu against the actor. In the legal route to curbing free speech, the process becomes the punishment – as in Sharma’s case – subjecting individuals to police harassment and court hearings. The threats of physical harm, on the other hand, represent blatant disregard for laws and human rights. BJP, as India’s dominant party, must caution its NDA partner, Sangh Parivar affiliates and its own members against intolerance of dissent. Such actions would, in turn, have a salutary effect on other sociopolitical forces and produce a climate conducive for free speech and vigorous exchange of thoughts and ideas

Have something to say? Post your comment