Sunday, April 11, 2021
Follow us on
BREAKING NEWS
पीएम मोदी बोले- आज से हम सभी देशभर में टीका उत्सव की शुरुआत कर रहेहरियाणा के स्वास्थ्य एवं गृह मंत्री अनिल विज आज अम्बाला में सुभाष चंद्र बोस पार्क का उद्घाटन करेंगेबंगालः आज बर्दमान जाएंगी टीएमसी सुप्रीमो ममता बनर्जी, करेंगी रोड शोदेश में आज से शुरू होगा वर्कप्लेस पर वैक्सीनेशन, 'टीका उत्सव' का भी होगा आगाजIPL-14 के तीसरे मैच में आज सनराइजर्स हैदराबाद का कोलकाता नाइट राइडर्स से होगा मुकाबलागृह मंत्री अमित शाह का पश्चिम बंगाल दौरा आज, कई कार्यक्रमों में करेंगे शिरकतहरियाणा के मुख्यमंत्री मनोहर लाल ने कोरोना की गाइडलाइन्स के एहतियात बरतने के दिए निर्देशराष्ट्रीय लोक अदालत का आयोजन हरियाणा के 22 जिलों और 33 उप-मण्डलों में किया गया
Editorial

HT EDITORIAL-The need for judicial distance and restraint

February 08, 2021 05:09 AM
COURTESY HT EDITORIAL FEB 8
The need for judicial distance and restraint
 
 

On Saturday, at an event to launch a commemo-rative stamp to mark 60 years of the Gujarat High Court (HC), Supreme Court (SC) judge Justice MR Shah hailed Prime Minister Narendra Modi as “our most popular, vibrant and visionary leader”. Gujarat HC Chief Justice (CJ) Vikram Nath attributed Mr Modi’s popularity to his “sense of fairness and dedication towards his duties” and added that the PM has shown his resolve to ensure “the security of the entire world”. Justice Nath also praised Gujarat chief minister Vijay Rupani for his “inspirational leadership.” These interventions about the political leadership come in the backdrop of another senior judge of SC, Justice Arun Mishra (now retired), having praised Mr Modi as a “versatile genius” last year.

Judges are also citizens, and, as citizens, within their rights to hold private political views. But judges also have a constitutional responsibility to safeguard the Constitution, a key pillar of which is the separation of powers between the executive and judiciary. They not only have to be fair but also have to be seen as being fair, especially since the government is a key litigant in a range of cases they have to decide on. Faith in the judiciary often rests on the faith that judges will not allow their personal preferences to dictate judicial decisions.

At a time when judicial decisions are increasingly seen as aligned with executive preferences, or when the judiciary has come under criticism for inconsistency or delays, such remarks will only fuel doubts about the independence of the judiciary and whether members of the bench are perhaps too overawed by the leader of the executive branch. Judges must exercise restraint and independence.

Have something to say? Post your comment