Thursday, February 29, 2024
Follow us on
हिमाचल कांग्रेस के विद्रोही विधायकों को झटका, स्पीकर ने की 6 बागी विधायकों की सदस्यता रद्दचंडीगढ़:हरियाणा मंत्रिपरिषद की बैठक 6 मार्च 2024 को सुबह 11 बजे हरियाणा सचिवालय में होगीहरियाणा पुलिस की बड़ी कार्रवाई,किसान आंदोलन में उपद्रव करने वालों का पासपोर्ट और वीजा रद्द किया जाएगा,कई उपद्रवियों की हुई पहचान, हाई रेजोल्यूशन कैमरे की मदद से की गई पहचाननॉर्वे के समंदर में हेलीकॉप्टर की क्रैश लैंडिंग, सभी 6 लोगों को बचाया गयावीवीआईपी चॉपर स्कैम केस: राउज एवेन्यू कोर्ट ने जेम्स मिशेल की जमानत याचिका खारिज कीमध्य प्रदेश के डिंडौरी में भीषण सड़क हादसा,14 की मौत और 21 घायलकिसान आंदोलन में खनौरी बॉर्डर पर मारे गए शुभकरण सिंह का आज होगा अंतिम संस्कारहिमाचल में फिर हलचल तेज, CM सुक्खू ने घर पर मीटिंग के लिए सभी मंत्री-विधायकों को बुलाया

HT EDITORIAL-The need for judicial distance and restraint

February 08, 2021 05:09 AM
The need for judicial distance and restraint

On Saturday, at an event to launch a commemo-rative stamp to mark 60 years of the Gujarat High Court (HC), Supreme Court (SC) judge Justice MR Shah hailed Prime Minister Narendra Modi as “our most popular, vibrant and visionary leader”. Gujarat HC Chief Justice (CJ) Vikram Nath attributed Mr Modi’s popularity to his “sense of fairness and dedication towards his duties” and added that the PM has shown his resolve to ensure “the security of the entire world”. Justice Nath also praised Gujarat chief minister Vijay Rupani for his “inspirational leadership.” These interventions about the political leadership come in the backdrop of another senior judge of SC, Justice Arun Mishra (now retired), having praised Mr Modi as a “versatile genius” last year.

Judges are also citizens, and, as citizens, within their rights to hold private political views. But judges also have a constitutional responsibility to safeguard the Constitution, a key pillar of which is the separation of powers between the executive and judiciary. They not only have to be fair but also have to be seen as being fair, especially since the government is a key litigant in a range of cases they have to decide on. Faith in the judiciary often rests on the faith that judges will not allow their personal preferences to dictate judicial decisions.

At a time when judicial decisions are increasingly seen as aligned with executive preferences, or when the judiciary has come under criticism for inconsistency or delays, such remarks will only fuel doubts about the independence of the judiciary and whether members of the bench are perhaps too overawed by the leader of the executive branch. Judges must exercise restraint and independence.

Have something to say? Post your comment