Saturday, February 22, 2020
Follow us on
BREAKING NEWS
खट्टर सरकार का ब्राह्मण विरोधी DNA हुआ उजागरशिवसेना सांसद संजय रावत बोले-महाराष्ट्र के CM उद्धव ठाकरे 7 मार्च का जाएंगे अयोध्याJ-K: बारामूला में पुलिस ने हिजबुल मुजाहिदीन के एक सक्रिय आतंकवादी को किया गिरफ्तारJ-K: डीजीपी दिलबाग सिंह बोले- इस साल अब तक 25 आतंकी मारे गएदिल्ली यूनिवर्सिटी के नॉर्थ कैम्पस में VC ऑफिस के सामने अचेत अवस्था में मिली लड़कीJK पुलिसः सुरक्षा बलों ने लश्कर-ए-तैयबा के 2 आतंकी मार गिराएदिल्लीः आज अंतरराष्ट्रीय न्यायिक सम्मेलन का उद्घाटन करेंगे PM नरेंद्र मोदीगार्गी कॉलेज में छेड़छाड़ मामले में दिल्ली महिला आयोग की अध्यक्ष से मिलेंगी छात्राएं
Niyalya se

HC: Pb, Hry DMs can’t order eviction in senior citizen cases

January 26, 2020 06:43 AM

COURTESY TOI JAN 26

HC: Pb, Hry DMs can’t order eviction in senior citizen cases
Ajay.Sura@timesgroup.com

Chandigarh:

The Punjab and Haryana high court made it clear that district magistrates (DM) in Punjab and Haryana cannot pass any order pertaining to eviction from the property or house while deciding the plea of a senior citizen under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens (MWPSC) Act, 2007.


According to the HC, only the judiciary, being well-versed with the legal procedures, is empowered to pass eviction order in such matters. Court was of the view that giving eviction powers to magistrates “is open to wide abuse of the process of law in the hands of the executive”.

The HC passed these orders while setting aside the action plan framed by Punjab and Haryana governments under the MWPSC Act, empowering district magistrates to pass orders to evict any ‘trouble-maker’ family member from a senior citizen’s property.

Justice Rajiv Narain Raina of the HC passed these orders on January 23, 2020, while deciding a petition filed by a Patiala woman challenging the Punjab rules-2014 framed under MWPSC Act providing powers to magistrates to pass eviction orders.

In its 148-page verdict, Justice Raina said, “…A family’s own special needs, circumstances, and expectations of each other are variable and their station in life, their social standing, their financial position can be vastly different that they cannot be measured on the same scale and with one brush of a heartless government order... Each case has to be decided on its own facts and circumstances [and] on the basis of evidence,” observed the high court.


SENIOR CITIZENS WELFARE ACT

‘Protection of property can’t be put off’

Challenging the rules, senior advocate Anupam Gupta submitted that the complexities of law, such as the nature of self-acquired property or ancestral property in the Hindu Mitakshara personal law, HUF, succession, inheritance, women’s rights to property, rule of possession by birth, allocation of parental property and joint family property etc. deserve not to be left in the hands of the executive authority of the district magistrate, unless we live in a police state and are proud of it in upholding the hateful principle that anyone can be thrown out at anytime from anywhere.

Appearing for the Union government, Satya Pal Jain, additional solicitor general of India, submitted that judicial powers ought not be left, in principle, in the hands of district magistrates. Jain submitted that executive officers can be amenable to personal, political, and social pressure.

However, defending the powers of district magistrates, Punjab advocate general Atul Nanda submitted that the urgent need of the senior citizen for peace and the protection of life and property cannot be postponed to a long-drawn litigation in a regular court.

Haryana AG Baldev Raj Mahajan defended the rules contending that preference has to be given to senior citizens under the the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act and it provides a short-cut remedy.

Have something to say? Post your comment
 
More Niyalya se News
कश्मीर मुक्ति-मुस्लिम मुक्ति के नारे लगाने वाली लड़की 14 दिन की न्यायिक हिरासत में भेजी गई नागपुर की एक कोर्ट से देवेंद्र फडणवीस को 15000 रुपये के निजी मुचलके पर जमानत उपहार अग्निकांड: सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने पीड़ितों की ओर से दाखिल क्यूरेटिव पिटीशन को खारिज किया अलॉटी का रिफंड नहीं दिए जाने पर कोर्ट ने कहा- जब तक रुपए नहीं देते तब तक जेल में रखोकोर्ट ने मामले की अगली सुनवाई 25 मार्च तय की दिल्ली: साकेत कोर्ट ने JNU छात्र शरजील इमाम को 3 मार्च तक न्यायिक हिरासत में भेजा जजाें की नियुक्ति की सिफारिशाें पर सरकार 127 ताे काॅलेजियम 119 दिन में लेती है फैसलाकेंद्र सरकार ने सुप्रीम काेर्ट काे दी जानकारी निर्भया केस में पटियाला कोर्ट ने 3 मार्च सुबह 6 बजे के लिए नया डेथ वारंट किया जारी Govt staffers to get benefit of tenure in aided schools HC Says It Will Be Included In ACP And Pension Calculation Peaceful CAA opposers not ‘traitors, anti-nationals’: HC INX मीडिया मामले में आरोपी कार्ती चिदंबरम को सुप्रीम कोर्ट से मिली विदेश जाने की इजाजत