Saturday, February 22, 2020
Follow us on
BREAKING NEWS
खट्टर सरकार का ब्राह्मण विरोधी DNA हुआ उजागरशिवसेना सांसद संजय रावत बोले-महाराष्ट्र के CM उद्धव ठाकरे 7 मार्च का जाएंगे अयोध्याJ-K: बारामूला में पुलिस ने हिजबुल मुजाहिदीन के एक सक्रिय आतंकवादी को किया गिरफ्तारJ-K: डीजीपी दिलबाग सिंह बोले- इस साल अब तक 25 आतंकी मारे गएदिल्ली यूनिवर्सिटी के नॉर्थ कैम्पस में VC ऑफिस के सामने अचेत अवस्था में मिली लड़कीJK पुलिसः सुरक्षा बलों ने लश्कर-ए-तैयबा के 2 आतंकी मार गिराएदिल्लीः आज अंतरराष्ट्रीय न्यायिक सम्मेलन का उद्घाटन करेंगे PM नरेंद्र मोदीगार्गी कॉलेज में छेड़छाड़ मामले में दिल्ली महिला आयोग की अध्यक्ष से मिलेंगी छात्राएं
Niyalya se

DCs cannot pass eviction order on senior citizens’ complaint, says HC

January 26, 2020 05:56 AM

COURRTESY HT JAN 26
Maintenance of Parents Act Eviction can take place only through civil suits dealt with by judicial courts, which adjudicate on property disputes, observes court on Patiala woman’s petition
Surender Sharma

letterschd@hindustantimes.com

CHANDIGARH : The Punjab and Haryana high court has held that deputy commissioners (DCs) adjudicating a dispute between family members on the complaint of a senior citizen can’t pass eviction orders.

The high court bench of justice RN Raina quashed these provisions in the action plans of Punjab, Haryana Chandigarh terming these in violation of the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007.

“Even beneficial legislation can’t be stretched beyond the confines of the law and to the breaking point in the grave matter of eviction beyond the provisions of the parent Act,” the bench said.

The high court was hearing a plea from a Patiala woman having two children against whom eviction orders were passed by the DC on the complaint of her mother-in-law.

The husband of the petitioner woman and her father-in-law had died. The woman, who came to India in 2014, and her mother-in-law entered into a dispute as soon as the former’s husband died. The matter reached high court in February 2018.

The case was argued over four months and culminated in a 148-page judgment. Lawyers say it is the first-of-its-kind judgment in the country on the issue.

While senior advocate Anupam Gupta appeared for the petitioner woman, senior advocate Puneet Bali pleaded for her mother-in-law.

Advocate generals of Punjab and Haryana Atul Nanda and Baldev Raj Mahajan argued the case themselves after the court issued notices to the Chandigarh administration and Haryana as well. Additional solicitor general Satya Pal Jain represented the Centre.

The action plans were prepared under state government rules for the effective implementation of the Central Act.

Punjab action plan was notified in 2014.

The petitioner had argued that the action plan was ultra vires the Act itself, further saying that objects and purposes of the law was only to establish only a maintenance tribunal and eviction was not mandated in central law.

The DCs act as maintenance tribunal under the Act.

Both Punjab and Haryana governments had reasoned that action plan was for the welfare of senior citizens.The high court termed these action plans as an “executive order” observing that the DCs do not possess the power of eviction. It is open to wide abuse of the process of law in the hands of the executive, the court said, adding that plans do not lay down any guidelines to control, guide or supervise such extreme harsh and tyrannical quasi judicial powers by the DCs.

The court further said that the Maintenance Tribunal is not an eviction tribunal and eviction can take place only through civil suits dealt with by the judicial courts, which adjudicate on disputes with regard of property.

“Laws of land reform in India …all of which have greatly contributed to a new social order ….has led to complexities in litigation which happens only in India. Only judges should handle this and not the executive officers,” the court observed

Have something to say? Post your comment
 
More Niyalya se News
कश्मीर मुक्ति-मुस्लिम मुक्ति के नारे लगाने वाली लड़की 14 दिन की न्यायिक हिरासत में भेजी गई नागपुर की एक कोर्ट से देवेंद्र फडणवीस को 15000 रुपये के निजी मुचलके पर जमानत उपहार अग्निकांड: सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने पीड़ितों की ओर से दाखिल क्यूरेटिव पिटीशन को खारिज किया अलॉटी का रिफंड नहीं दिए जाने पर कोर्ट ने कहा- जब तक रुपए नहीं देते तब तक जेल में रखोकोर्ट ने मामले की अगली सुनवाई 25 मार्च तय की दिल्ली: साकेत कोर्ट ने JNU छात्र शरजील इमाम को 3 मार्च तक न्यायिक हिरासत में भेजा जजाें की नियुक्ति की सिफारिशाें पर सरकार 127 ताे काॅलेजियम 119 दिन में लेती है फैसलाकेंद्र सरकार ने सुप्रीम काेर्ट काे दी जानकारी निर्भया केस में पटियाला कोर्ट ने 3 मार्च सुबह 6 बजे के लिए नया डेथ वारंट किया जारी Govt staffers to get benefit of tenure in aided schools HC Says It Will Be Included In ACP And Pension Calculation Peaceful CAA opposers not ‘traitors, anti-nationals’: HC INX मीडिया मामले में आरोपी कार्ती चिदंबरम को सुप्रीम कोर्ट से मिली विदेश जाने की इजाजत