Thursday, October 01, 2020
Follow us on
दिल्ली: हाथरस के लिए निकलीं प्रियंका गांधी, राहुल गांधी प्रियंका के साथ नहीं जा रहे हैंहाथरस की घटना को लेकर हरिद्वार में प्रदर्शन, दोषियों को फांसी देने की मांगहाथरस: गैंगरेप की घटना के खिलाफ गुस्सा, सड़कों पर उतरे लोगहरियाणा शहरी विकास प्राधिकरण (हुडा)ने अपने सभी टेंपरेरी कर्मचारियों की सेवाएं समाप्त कीहाथरस: पीड़ित परिवार की सुरक्षा में तैनात 3 पुलिसकर्मी कोरोना पॉजिटिवनए कृषि कानूनों के खिलाफ पंजाब में किसान करेंगे प्रदर्शन, रेल रोको का ऐलानमुंबई: चेंबूर रेलवे स्टेशन के पास बाजार में लगी आग, मौके पर पहुंचीं 10 दमकल गाड़ियांअसमः परीक्षा प्रश्न पत्र लीक मामले में बीजेपी नेता दिबान डेका अरेस्ट
Niyalya se

No coercive action against Farah, Raveena: High court tells Punjab Cases Of ‘Hurt Religious Sentiments’

January 24, 2020 07:05 AM


No coercive action against Farah, Raveena: High court tells Punjab
Cases Of ‘Hurt Religious Sentiments’


The Punjab and Haryana high court on Thursday restrained the Punjab government from taking any coercive action against director-choreographer Farah Khan and Bollywood actor Raveena Tandon in a case related to hurting religious sentiments.

The HC has also issued notice to the Punjab government and the complainant in the case seeking their replies by March 25 on the petition filed by both the celebrities.

Justice Ashok Kumar Verma of the HC passed these orders while hearing a petition filed by Farah and Raveena seeking directions to quash the case registered against them.

The counsel for the petitioners contended that from the contents of the FIR, none of the ingredients pertaining to offence under Section 295-A of the IPC are made out. The allegations are vague and general in nature with the ulterior motive to fasten the criminal liability on the petitioners. The petitioners’ statements cannot be perceived to be disrespectful or hurtful to the sentiments of the Christian brothers or do not remotely qualify to constitute the offence under Section 295-A of the IPC, the counsel argued.

It was further contended that the FIR has been concocted on non-existent facts.

On December 25,2019, they were booked by Ajnala police under Section 295-A of the IPC for deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage religious feelings of any class by insulting its religion or religious beliefs. They had allegedly made some comments about the Bible. The FIR was registered on the complaint filed by Sona Masih alias Sonu Jaffar. Accordign to the complaint, the show aired on the eve of Christmas, where the celebrities allegedly made fun of the word “Hallelujah.”

When their plea seeking quashing of FIR came up for hearing before the HC on Thursday, their counsel submitted that Farah and Raveena were producer/ anchor and guest/ participant of a show telecast on a digital platform. The counsel for the celebrities, advocate Abhinav Sood argued that the so-called incident arises from an unintentional conversation during the quizzing of two participants by the host at Mumbai on November 30, 2019.

“The show was not being telecast for discussing anything about Christian or Christianity. It was a show for entertaining people and it was a non-fiction quiz show. In this situation, no ill-intention on the part of the applicant can be attributed by any stretch of imagination,” counsel has submitted. The matter would now come up for hearing on March 25

Have something to say? Post your comment
More Niyalya se News
बाबरी विध्वंस केस में फैसला सुनाते ही जज सुरेंद्र यादव रिटायर बाबरी विध्वंस केसः अराजक तत्वों ने गिराया ढांचा, नेताओं की भूमिका के साक्ष्य नहीं- कोर्ट बाबरी विध्वंस केसः कोर्ट में आरोप साबित नहीं कर पाई CBI, सभी आरोपी बरी
बाबरी विध्वंस केस में लालकृष्ण आडवाणी, मुरली मनोहर जोशी समेत सभी 32 आरोपी बरी
सुप्रीम कोर्ट ने महबूबा मुफ्ती को पार्टी की बैठकों में शामिल होने की अनुमति देने से इनकार किया Court asks why three former CBI chiefs not questioned for graft मुंबईः ड्रग्स केस में कोर्ट ने क्षितिज प्रसाद को 3 अक्टूबर तक NCB रिमांड पर भेजा Women free to choose vocation: HC मुंबई: कंगना केस में अब सोमवार को 11 बजे होगी बॉम्बे हाई कोर्ट में सुनवाई SC seeks govt, UPSC reply over prelims exam