Sunday, December 15, 2019
Follow us on
BREAKING NEWS
नेपालः 40 यात्रियों को लेकर जा रही बस दुर्घटनाग्रस्त, 12 की मौतपंजाबः लुधियाना के डीएसपी ने राज्यमंत्री पर लगाया धमकी देने का आरोपदिल्लीः खत्म हुई स्वाति मालीवाल की भूख हड़ताल, डॉक्टरों ने लगाई ड्रिपसरदार पटेल की 69वीं पुण्यतिथि आज, हरियाणा के उपमुख्यमंत्री दुष्यन्त चौटाला ने दी श्रद्धांजलिरणदीप सुरजेवाला ने ट्वीट करके भाजपा-जजपा सरकार पर निशाना साधाआज से फास्टैग सिस्टम लागू, नहीं लगाने पर देना होगा दोगुना टोलजम्मू-कश्मीर और हिमाचल में बर्फबारी, मैदानी इलाकों में बढ़ी ठिठुरनलंदन में भारतीय दूतावास के सामने नागरिकता संशोधन कानून को लेकर विरोध प्रदर्शन
Editorial

TOI EDIT-A New Beginning Verdict must herald end of mandir-masjid politics

November 11, 2019 06:10 AM

COURTESY TIMESOF INDIA NOV 11

A New Beginning
Verdict must herald end of mandir-masjid politics. Move on India, let the past not hold us hostage
On Saturday five judges of the highest court of the land, including the Chief Justice of India, put their best foot forward to deliver a unanimous verdict on what has been an intractable religious dispute, running on for more than a century. The judicial resolution by the topmost court came after India’s politicians proved themselves unequal to the task and all mediation efforts failed. Let the verdict now draw a line under the dispute, so that India can heal and move on. A good start has been made with most political parties welcoming the judgment. At stake is individual progress, communal harmony, national unity and constitutional morality. India’s multicultural ethos has always prided itself for tolerance to diversity and accepting the equality of religions.

In allocating the disputed land where Babri Masjid once stood for constructing a Rama temple, Supreme Court has recognised evidence of a long unbroken tradition of worship by Hindus at the site. By directing the central/ UP government to award five acres of land within Ayodhya city at a prominent location to build a mosque, SC was conscious that justice would not prevail if Muslims were not remedied for the 1949 desecration when idols were surreptitiously placed inside Babri Masjid followed by its unlawful destruction in 1992.


Those resorting to triumphalism must understand the spirit behind SC accepting the maintainability of Ram Lalla’s title claim. Piety and devotion of the faithful and not political, divisive or destructive machinations carried the day in favour of a temple at the site. The Centre as well as state governments must also accept and strictly uphold this judgment’s stipulation calling on them to abide by the Places of Worship (Special Provision) Act, 1991, which forbids the conversion of any other place of worship as it existed on August 15, 1947.

SC has invoked the Acquisition of Certain Area at Ayodhya Act, 1993, to direct Centre to create a trust to oversee temple construction. Only those willing to uphold the Places of Worship Act must find a place on the Board of Trustees, lest this creates a precedent and incentive for fuelling other mandir-masjid disputes. Picking up on Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s call to set aside bitterness and fear and move ahead as one for the country’s development, BJP and saffron parties must avoid triumphalism and drop future mandir-masjid agitations. Let there be no repeat of 1992. India has had enough

 
Have something to say? Post your comment