Wednesday, August 21, 2019
Follow us on
HARYANA-BJP leaders upset over removal of posters ahead of CM’s rallyMOSQUE ASSAULT No Haryana nod for sanction in 2 yrs, trial of right-wing activists yet to startPvt sector salaries logged slowest growth in a decadeIdentify weak links, Shah tells Hry, Maha, Delhi BJP leadersSYL: Centre to hold meet with Haryana, Punjab reps today सीएम की जन आशीर्वाद यात्रा: दिखी टिकटार्थियों में होड़, शक्ति प्रदर्शन के चक्कर में पूर्व विधायक लीलाराम गुर्जर और नरेंद्र गुर्जर के कार्यकर्ताओं में चले लात-घूंसे टिकटार्थियों की भीड़ देख सीएम बोले- एक अनार सौ बीमार, पर एक को ही देंगे टिकट, बाकी मिलकर खिलाओ कमल सीएम की जन आशीर्वाद यात्रा में विधानसभा चुनाव के लिए कैथल में टिकटार्थियों ने किया शक्ति प्रदर्शनहरियाणा की 4 जेलों में शिफ्ट होंगे जम्मू-कश्मीर के बंदी  : जम्मू कश्मीर में अनुच्छेद 370 हटने के बाद बंदियों को शिफ्ट करने की तैयारी
Niyalya se

HC puts Centre, Haryana on notice

February 07, 2019 04:58 AM


HC puts Centre, Haryana on notice
CHANDIGARH: The Punjab and Haryana high court on Wednesday put Centre and Haryana government on notice on a plea challenging the Centre’s decision to grant 10% reservation for economically weaker sections in jobs and admissions to educational institutions.

The petition filed by a Hisar resident seeks quashing of the Constitution Act, 2019 and sought direction to Centre to not to implement the reservation by the state and Centre claiming that it was in violation of Supreme Court’s 1992 judgment in the Indira Sawhney case, in which upper ceiling for reservation was fixed at 50%. The high court has sought response by March 13.

The lawyers, SK Verma and Lal Bahadur Khowal had argued that the reservation cannot be availed by SCs, STs or OBCs, who are not just economically but socially backward too. There is no definition under the Constitution for the weaker sections.

Moreover, economically weaker sections have not faced any kind of social injustice or discrimination. It was also submitted that the law enacted is a step to hasten to finish the reservations based on the social backwardness and to introduce only the economic criteria for reservations.

There is no contemporaneous empirical data collected or published to know the status of economically weaker sections and that they require the benefit under the impugned Act more than the SCs/STs/OBCs, court was told.

Have something to say? Post your comment